Thursday, September 25, 2014

Getting High Throughout HIstory

Hi all! Great class today! As you know, in class I talked a bit about some of the pharmcological
agents people use/have used to ameliorate discomfort, such as magic mushrooms, weed, and even nutmeg. However, if you want to know more about the history of pharmacology, I recommend that you check out this link.

Have a great weekend!

Thanks,
Dr. Stratford

Sunday, September 14, 2014

Monday, September 8, 2014

Close Encounters of a Movie Kind

Hello Budding Behavioral Neuroscientists! Do you ever feel like a mindless zombie when you leave a movie theater? Although I don't have time to write to a full-on blog post this week, I thought you may like to hear about what happens to your brain when you watch a movie in the theater. As we learned in class, one way to visualize brain activity in awake, behaving humans is with fMRI
(functional magnetic resonance imaging).

Researchers at Princeton university recorded brain activity while subjects watched a movie, and found that several brain areas appear to 'sync up.' However, the effect doesn't happen with all movies ('structured' movies are better at syncing). Perhaps as a precursor to mind control, movie studio executives should screen test all their movies with the audience sitting in fMRIs! If you want to know more, please click here.

Monday, September 1, 2014

What Dead Salmon Tell Us About Statistics

Greetings Students of Science!

In class, we discussed the importance of using the appropriate statistical analyses and controls, but it may surprise you to find out that using a dead salmon in a research study can actually lead to a scientific revolution!

In 2010, a study published in the 'Journal of Serendipitous and Unexpected Results' (yes, that is a real scientific journal) showed how important it is to properly analyze your data. In their study, Bennett et al. put a dead salmon in an fMRI machine, showed the salmon a serious of visual images, and then analyzed the fMRI results in several different ways. Typically, fMRI data is analyzed by comparing changes in blood flow
between up to 130,000 different subareas of the brain (called voxels). However, all the different comparisons made exponentially increases the chance of finding a false positive result (e.g. a significant result when there isn't one). While most fMRI researchers correct for these multiple comparisons, at the time that Bennett et al. did their study, some fMRI researchers did not.
Dead Salmon 'brain activation.' Image courtesy of
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/scicurious-brain/2012/09/25/
ignobel-prize-in-neuroscience-the-dead-salmon-study/

To address this issue, Bennett et al., analyzed their fMRI-dead-salmon data in two different ways (either controlling for multiple comparisons, or not). The authors found that when their data were analyzed without correcting to the use of multiple comparisons, the dead salmon's brain showed significant activation in response to various visual stimuli. Surprisingly, the reaction from the scientific community was mostly positive, and encouraged many researchers to rethink the way they analyzed their data.

If you want to read more about this 'fishy' tale, please click here.

Monday, August 25, 2014

Men Are from Mars, Women Are from ????

Hello fellow neuroscientists. This week we will review the cells of the nervous system, and the structure and function of various parts of the brain. Did you know that very little is known about how the brains of men and women differ at a cellular or molecular level? Its true! For years, researchers shied away from using female subjects because, as one scientists said to me, 'why would you want to have all those hormones muck things up?'

Unfortunately, this oversight may have severe consequences. We know that men and women metabolize some medications differently (ex. this). What about our brains? How do the brains of men and women differ? This question isn't purely philosophical, as it has important implications for the treatment of diseases in men vs. women. Luckily, scientists are now beginning to recognize the importance of using females in basic science research. In fact, the National Institutes of Health (NIH)  now requires that animals of both sexes must be used in all new scientific research (you can read about the new NIH initiative here). Not to be cliché, but only time will tell whether this new scientific direction provides invaluable insights.

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Golgi's Got an Axon to Grind

Greetings fellow behavioral neuroscientists. Welcome to the inaugural post of our course blog. Did you know that scientists are human too? Prone to fits of jealously and filled with boundless ego, scientists can be considered the ultimate 'Frenemy.'

Santiago Ramón y Cajal
Camillo Golgi
Take for example the well-documented friction between noted neuroanatomists, Camillo Golgi and Santiago Ramón y Cajal. The basic dispute centered around the fundamental organization of the brain. Golgi believed that the brain was made up of a single interlinking network (called the Reticular Theory); whereas Cajal thought that nervous system is made up of discrete individual cells (the Neuron Theory).

Unfortunately, this dispute was not resolved in either of these two men's lifetimes (although Cajal's thoery was eventually proven true). Nevertheless, both men achieved great success and notoriety, and even shared the 1906 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Surprisingly, even this prestigious award wasn't enough to bury the hatchet between Golgi and Cajal. Golgi even used his Nobel Prize speech as a opportunity to attempt to discredit Cajal (if you want to read the actual transcript of Golgi's lecture, click here).